|
This protocol/strategy asks educators from all subjects that require the written word to allow students to be accountable for content as well as how the content is expressed. By selecting the five most glaring Language Arts mistakes within written responses and efficiently sharing that information with students can help them be mindful in all subjects, not just Language Arts. The key for teachers is to create a simplified marking code. Questions? Comment below. SIMPLIFIED CODED MARKING (Feedback, Writing) Description: Language Arts teachers have been using corrective feedback shorthand forever, but the practice in other subjects is rarely used and yet, many subjects require written answers. Subject-area teachers are focused on the content of the answer, but with one-time preparation, they can also require students to use fundamental mechanics, grammar, and format. This cross-connection firmly solidifies the idea that proper use of the written word spans all subjects, not just Language Arts. Subject teachers can point out glaring errors by using a simplified coded marking chart. Application: Use the simplified coded marking chart in any non-Language Arts subject that requires written work like short answer responses, reports, or subject matter essays. Process: Consult with other subject teachers in the school (optional) to create a uniform coded marking chart and create the document with the top five major errors students make in their written responses. Hand-out/post chart, review, and remind students to keep it for the duration of the class. Assign minimal point values to the errors and deduct from the overall assignment total. Reassure students that as errors are corrected, grades will rise. Because each group is different, use the example chart below as a template:  For resources or more information:
Fairlamb, A (2018) Adventures in Coded Marking Adventures in coded marking (innovatemyschool.com)
0 Comments
|