- Published on
Greetings Cross Creek Educators,
In this hybrid book study teachers will earn a total of 12 hours (1.2 ceu's) for reading each chapter, responding to discussion prompts online, and sharing application of ideas. You will be given no later than (NLT) dates for completing chapters.
I want to thank Melissa Storms for giving me much needed help with this study. In growth mindset fashion, I had to experience a little failure in order to become a better blogger.
Instructions:
Read chapter four, click on "comments" to answer. Number your answer to correspond with the question. You will be asked to 1. Describe a critical thinking activity that you use in your classroom. You will then look at your assigned colleague's entry and 2. respond, summing up why their activity employs the elements of critical thinking (Pages 55-56).
It doesn't matter who responds first.
*Reynolds responds to Merritt, Merritt responds to Reynolds
*Hasapis responds to McGinnis, McGinnis responds to Hasapis
*Hosking responds to Huffman, Huffman responds to Hosking
*Howard responds to Little, Little responds to Howard
*Starling responds to Kerr, Kerr responds to Starling
*Rappold responds to Rivera, Rivera responds to Rappold
*Shields responds to a colleague of her choice.
Let's aim for December 2 for the description of the critical thinking activity to be posted, and December 15th for the response.
A little different for Administration
*Patrick responds to Hickle, Hickle responds to Patrick to this question: Why is Critical Thinking Important in a Growth Mindset School Culture?
Remember there are cut-off limits, so brevity is the order of the day!
If you have questions feel free to contact me. athetford@edumentality or alisonthetford@aol.com.
In this hybrid book study teachers will earn a total of 12 hours (1.2 ceu's) for reading each chapter, responding to discussion prompts online, and sharing application of ideas. You will be given no later than (NLT) dates for completing chapters.
I want to thank Melissa Storms for giving me much needed help with this study. In growth mindset fashion, I had to experience a little failure in order to become a better blogger.
Instructions:
Read chapter four, click on "comments" to answer. Number your answer to correspond with the question. You will be asked to 1. Describe a critical thinking activity that you use in your classroom. You will then look at your assigned colleague's entry and 2. respond, summing up why their activity employs the elements of critical thinking (Pages 55-56).
It doesn't matter who responds first.
*Reynolds responds to Merritt, Merritt responds to Reynolds
*Hasapis responds to McGinnis, McGinnis responds to Hasapis
*Hosking responds to Huffman, Huffman responds to Hosking
*Howard responds to Little, Little responds to Howard
*Starling responds to Kerr, Kerr responds to Starling
*Rappold responds to Rivera, Rivera responds to Rappold
*Shields responds to a colleague of her choice.
Let's aim for December 2 for the description of the critical thinking activity to be posted, and December 15th for the response.
A little different for Administration
*Patrick responds to Hickle, Hickle responds to Patrick to this question: Why is Critical Thinking Important in a Growth Mindset School Culture?
Remember there are cut-off limits, so brevity is the order of the day!
If you have questions feel free to contact me. athetford@edumentality or alisonthetford@aol.com.
It is essential to incorporate critical thinking practice as part of a growth mindset school culture because one makes the other more easily attainable as well as sustainable in a school environment. It seems that when students are taught to trust themselves to think critically by having ample content-based opportunities to do so, they tend to automatically become more persistent and eager in their attempts at learning as well as gentler with themselves and others when they don't quite reach the mark. As a counselor, I love the fact that due to this research, some students in recent years have had the opportunity to begin their educational journeys with a growth mindset in place and are encouraged to further develop it. I am saddened at the fact that most older students, particularly those at high school age, have not had the consistent opportunity to experience this arm-in-arm practice of critical thinking development along with the belief in a growth mindset. It speaks to the fact that it is urgent that we focus attention on these "older" learners in our systems who have had many years to dwell in fixed mindsets and experience inconsistent or isolated critical thinking practice. These concepts, supported with lessons on brain research, would help many students release themselves from either the pressure of perfectionism, or fear-based under-performance before they pursue post-secondary schooling options.
Ms. Hickle stated the major challenge is that by high school, students have bought into the fixed mindset culture and the inconsisent/or isolated critical thinking practices.
I think challenging than the mindsets of high school students, is that of high school teachers/staff. If we want the mindsets of our students to change, our mindset has to change, as well. One way to change is to incorporate more opportunities for our students of all levels to engage in critical thinking and believing that they will be successful. The author stated that she doubts that simply increasing the amount of critical thinking engagement will do anything unless it is accompanied by a growth mindset culture. So, the two must be incorporated together to make change effective.
It would be interesting to do this project here at Cross Creek and see the result. Maybe starting with the new freshman we get for the 17-18 school year.
One critical thinking activity I use in the classroom is a review activity I use at the conclusion of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. I place the students in groups of two. Each pair of students is given an envelope with the major events of the play cut into strips and mixed up. The students have to then work with one another and place the events in chronological order. I time this activity and the pair that has each event in the proper order first gets a prize. The students love the competition element and they have to think critically in order to get all of the events in the proper order.
As sort of a Devil's advocate - what happens once a team has the whole thing lined up correctly? Is the activity over? If I got put with a dead weight partner, what incentive do I have to even try when I know a team that cares will win?
A critical thinking activity that I used in my 9th grade Honors Earth and Environmental Science class is experimental design. Many high school science courses approach laboratories with a cookbook or recipe approach, followed by a list of questions to answer about the findings. Based on my experience coaching the Experimental Design Science Olympiad event, I have observed how much students' critical thinking abilities improve when they question, ponder, research on their own, and devise their own hypotheses when they are given the latitude to design their own experiments. During Q1, each class brainstormed questions about composting after completing the textbook reading, a classroom discussion, and an interactive online lab. We used the consensus protocol to narrow the class experiment down to one question, and then designed an experiment in which each group represented a change to the independent variable. One class decided to study the effect of initial water volume on final compost particle size. One class decided to study the effect of the percentage of "greens" and "browns" on the final percentage of N-P-K (nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium) in the compost. The third class decided to study the effect of percentage of "greens" and "browns" on plant growth, as measured by total biomass above the ground.
In this chapter the author divides the process of critical thinking into 3 categories: reasoning, making judgments and problem solving. In order for this process to occur, there needs to be an infusion of content.
One of my driest lessons became one of my favorite to teach once I created a problem that only the content could solve. When teaching indirect object pronouns, I set up the following scenario: One student in a group has just inherited miscellaneous items from an unknown distant relative. Among the objects inherited are a puppy, a dusty manuscript, a Peruvian gold coin, a vacation home in the Canary Islands, an obscure painting, a complete set of DVDs of Disney’s Princesses, and an urn containing the great uncle’s ex-wife’s ashes. The one stipulation is that the student may keep only one item. Everything else must be divided among those in his/her group. Everyone must agree to the disbursement of the items and must record what the heir gave to each group member on a scroll resembling a Last Will and Testament.
Perhaps they have to explain the functionality or meaningfulness of the item they received. Why they need the item and how will they use it? Students need to think of a logical or creative use of their inherited item. Therefore, critical thinking skills are being used.
I used an activity where the students are grouped in pairs and given two sets of questions "A" and "B". One person in the group was asked to do only questions in set A and the other set B. Questions are different in both sets however the answers are the same for some questions. Students are then forced to think and come up with reasons as to why some answers are the same and some different.
Great submissions for both!
As the study of Romeo and Juliet progresses, the students are continually guided to think and determine critically about who was most responsible for the characters ending up dead. This is a question that is posed during the reading, on quizzes, and is the essay on the unit exam.
While this is not specifically an "Activity" in the guise of a protocol or specific instructional event, I consider it an essential part of studying the play. It addresses the types of thinking Willingham identified as essential to critical thinking and growth - reasoning, judgments, and critical thinking.
Functionally, the students must make value judgements about the motives and desires of characters and whether those choices were good, bad, or a little of both. It is an "Activity" built entirely on nuance and there is no prescribed correct answer.
is when teaching the past tense and shopping. Students were sent a gift of $100 dollars in cash and a gift card of $100 by their grandmother. Students needed to explain how they spent their money. They had to buy various items in different stores. They could not buy just a single expensive item, even tho there was a student who tried to buy a game console. They had to decide what he or she was going to buy with their gift card and make sure all the money was used. The hardest part is explaining their task in Spanish using the past participle, I went to..., I bought.... It cost... I paid with...Then, I went...
They have to plan critically what they are going to do, how they are going to do it and so forth and so on.
For the students this whole scenario is very challenging and I truly enjoy listening to them making this presentation.
In Civics, I use a city council activity have students address and solve a budgeting problem. Students have to listen to their peers and the presenting problem that each council character brings to the scenario, and then make a decision as to the best way to budget limited resources.